Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion

search


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Struck in Side, Many Cars Fare Poorly in Safety Test. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

Struck in Side, Many Cars Fare Poorly in Safety Test
by k at 11:09 am EDT, Apr 19, 2004

] Federal safety data has shown for years that booming
] sales of S.U.V.'s and large pickup trucks are adding to
] the death toll of people riding in cars, particularly in
] side-impact accidents. At the same time, S.U.V.'s and
] pickup trucks do not, as a class, better protect their
] own occupants, because they tend to be less stable and
] more prone to rollovers than passenger cars.

Guess what: if you're in a sedan and you get t-boned by an
SUV, you're fucked.

[ Proper fucked. This is a disturbing trend. Bad drivers want to feel safer so they get into massive trucks which are presumed to be more likely to protect them. Meanwhile they obliterate the poor sap they've caromed into because they were busy yammering on they cell phone while hauling their 4 rugrats to soccer practice. It'd be a lot safer to just put down the cell phone and learn how to drive.
p.s. most volvo drivers suck too. for the same reasons. -k]


 
RE: Struck in Side, Many Cars Fare Poorly in Safety Test
by janelane at 11:51 pm EDT, Apr 19, 2004

inignoct wrote:
] ] Federal safety data has shown for years that booming
] ] sales of S.U.V.'s and large pickup trucks are adding to
] ] the death toll of people riding in cars, particularly in
] ] side-impact accidents. At the same time, S.U.V.'s and
] ] pickup trucks do not, as a class, better protect their
] ] own occupants, because they tend to be less stable and
] ] more prone to rollovers than passenger cars.
]
] Guess what: if you're in a sedan and you get t-boned by an
] SUV, you're fucked.
]
] [ Proper fucked. This is a disturbing trend. Bad drivers
] want to feel safer so they get into massive trucks which are
] presumed to be more likely to protect them. Meanwhile they
] obliterate the poor sap they've caromed into because they were
] busy yammering on they cell phone while hauling their 4
] rugrats to soccer practice. It'd be a lot safer to just put
] down the cell phone and learn how to drive.
] p.s. most volvo drivers suck too. for the same reasons. -k]

What they neglect to mention in the article is that those same cars that fair badly in accidents with SUVs fair badly in the standard test, too. Some cars are just bloody deathtraps, no matter who you get into a wreck with.

Unfortunately, bills in the Senate and House relating to the auto industry are at the mercy of the auto industry. The number of fuel efficiency measures that have been struck down is just staggering.

Hopefully, the future will phase out the beastly SUVs and convert to the safer, more fuel efficent wagon style.


Struck in Side, Many Cars Fare Poorly in Safety Test
by bucy at 10:39 am EDT, Apr 19, 2004

] Federal safety data has shown for years that booming
] sales of S.U.V.'s and large pickup trucks are adding to
] the death toll of people riding in cars, particularly in
] side-impact accidents. At the same time, S.U.V.'s and
] pickup trucks do not, as a class, better protect their
] own occupants, because they tend to be less stable and
] more prone to rollovers than passenger cars.

Guess what: if you're in a sedan and you get t-boned by an
SUV, you're fucked.


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics