] So the value of the background check a "trusted traveler" ] goes through is unclear. Even if he has already turned ] his iris over to Sec. Ridge, any future 'anomaly' in his ] credit or phone records could conceivably put him into ] the special scrutiny category that entails more invasive ] searches. On the other hand, if TSA is being disingenuous ] and those who get the cards will undergo very little ] scrutiny, the system would be ripe for abuse, ] particularly by anyone with connections on the inside. This is a good summary of the TSA's announcement of a voluntary background check program for travellers. Does the TSA really live in an environment with strained budget problems where a program to reduce security checking is something they have to do to control costs? I doubt it. This is the government we're talking about here. If they want more money they need only make noises about homeland security. No one is going to deny them they funds they need. (However, the we're saving money story sure helps them spin this program with Congress.) I predict that this program will be rolled out with a slightly reduced burden for travellers who join it. Slowly the burden on people who are in the system will be increased once it is popular. The burden on those who are not in it will become ridiculously high so only a few nut cases like myself choose not to participate, at great personal cost when travelling. Eventually the program will cease to be optional. If everyone is doing it, whats the problem? If you don't like it, walk! This will be the basis for a biometric national ID card. It will replace drivers licenses, passports, etc... It will be checked constantly. If you fit the profile of a terrorist you'll be scooped up. This is the future, and don't guile yourself into believing you can make a difference here by voting. The Democrats pursue stuff like this even more ferociously then the Republicans. Kerry is already promising to increase funding for these programs. |