ryan is the supernicety wrote:
] ] Check this shit out (Fig. 1). That's bonafide, 100%-real
] ] data, my friends. I took it myself over the course of two
] ] weeks. And this was not a leisurely two weeks, either; I
] ] busted my ass day and night in order to provide you with
] ] nothing but the best data possible. Now, let's look a bit
] ] more closely at this data, remembering that it is
] ] absolutely first-rate. Do you see the exponential
] ] dependence? I sure don't. I see a bunch of crap.
] ]
] ] Christ, this was such a waste of my time.
] ]
] ] Banking on my hopes that whoever grades this will
] ] just look at the pictures, I drew an exponential through
] ] my noise. I believe the apparent legitimacy is enhanced
] ] by the fact that I used a complicated computer program to
] ] make the fit. I understand this is the same process by
] ] which the top quark was discovered.
]
] Funniest. Lab Report. Ever.

Yeah...I found this during my days in organic chemistry...I found it quite humorous, as it looks just like the data I generated in organic chem....aka...crap

Neoteric wrote:

Going into physics was the biggest mistake of my life. I should've declared CS. I still wouldn't have any women, but at least I'd be rolling in cash.

Okay science is still funny.

[ That's why I majored in *both*! Double the lack of women, but the cash situation is still ok, and there's some satisfaction when people are like "Ohh, you must be soooo smart... physics was the hardest thing ever!" I don't always mention that if it wasn't for my friends i'd have been up a creek for physics. -k]