Acidus wrote:
] An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th,
] 2001
]
] [snip]
]
] A facinating read (been at it over 2 hours now). While some of
] the info it presents I take with a grain of salt, the
] doucmentation on this website is superb, and very well
] written.

It's not superb, and it's not well-written. It's conspiracy-theorist garbage. I could start at the top paragraph of the site and work my way down, debunking every few sentences, but I'm not going to waste my time.

Just because someone says, "No one investigated this," does not mean it's true. Investigations *were* done, in excruciating detail.

This feels like more election year garbage to me. Give this guy enough rope, and he'll try to make some sort of case that Bush ordered the 9/11 attack, or that the towers never really collapsed, and it was all just Hollywood special effects.

He's trying to rewrite history, like those people that try to make the case that the Holocaust never happened, because they don't want to believe that it happened. But it *did* happen, and it really was horrible.

9/11 *did* happen, and it happened the way that you know it happened. Don't fall for this conspiracy crap. Feel free to do your own research though, and convince yourself of the truth. Because a generation from now, two generations from now, and more, there are going to be more people who haven't even been born yet, trying to claim that 9/11 never really happened. Because they just won't want to believe that something that bad *could* have happened.

If there's any one detail from the site that you really want to argue, fine, bring it on. I've done enough of my own research on this that I'm confident of the truth. *I* can tell from a glance that the site is garbage, but if you want help debunking, fine, let me know.

RE: 9-11 Research