Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

RE: CNN.com - Vaccine halts lung cancer in small study - Feb. 19, 2004

search


RE: CNN.com - Vaccine halts lung cancer in small study - Feb. 19, 2004
by Shannon at 1:17 am EST, Feb 21, 2004

Laughing Boy wrote:
] Vile wrote:
] ] Laughing Boy wrote:
] ] ] Nanochick wrote:
] ] ] ] ] An experimental vaccine wiped out lung cancer in some
] ] ] ] ] patients and slowed its spread in others in a small
] but
] ] ] ] ] promising study, researchers say.
] ] ] ]
] ] ] ]
] ] ] ] [wow...thats awesome. -nano]
] ] ]
] ] ] indeed it is. now they just need to figure out a vaccine
] ] that
] ] ] wipes out smoking - the #1 cause of lung cancer, and they
] ] will
] ] ] really be on to something!
] ]
] ] F**k that! I like cigarettes. Get rid of the lung cancer,
] and
] ] we can smoke safely.
]
] Yea you’re right - never mind emphysema, bronchitis, high
] blood pressure, low birth weight, asthma, heart disease,
] stroke, pneumonia, (shall I continue?) not to mention the
] myriad of OTHER cancers that have been linked to smoking. Get
] rid of lung cancer and you'll have nothing to worry about! :)
]
]
] ] BTW, pollution and contamination of
] ] drinking water are probably worse.
]
] WORSE??? Apparently we can chalk up one more thing attributed
] to smoking - chronic stupidity. Please don't make me
] bitch-slap you with statistics. Lung cancer is CLEARLY
] several magnitudes more prevalent in smokers than non-smokers.
] Pollution and drinking water? Sure. How many NON-smokers
] have you met that came down with lung cancer vs. smokers?
] Sure it happens, but a hell of a lot more frequently in
] smokers (and we won’t even get into how many cases in
] non-smokers are possibly caused by 2’nd hand smoke).
]
] ] IF you don't like smoking,
] ] then don't smoke. And if you don't like seeing others
] smoke,
] ] then kill yourself.
]
] I’ve no problem with smokers so long as my family doesn’t have
] to breathe that shit too. I just wish the tobacco companies
] were not being held accountable for billions of dollars in
] lawsuits for people’s stupidity “What? I have cancer from
] smoking 2 packs a day for 30 years?” Of course not dip-shit –
] it’s the water. All that wheezing and coughing and hacking up
] a lung every morning was your body’s way of telling you
] “everything is A-OK – light up!”
]
] And in regards to the “kill yourself” remark…
] http://www.ash.org.uk/html/factsheets/html/fact02.html
]
] Function impaired in smokers -
] Sperm count reduced
] Sperm motility impaired
] Sperm less able to penetrate the ovum
] Sperm shape abnormalities increased

]
]
] One word for you - Darwin.
]
] LB

I used to smoke. I stopped not because of health reasons, but because the tax hikes were too much to afford. If you don't like secondhand smoke, the fact that they have to pay a disproportionately higher amount of tax then you do, means you have to suffer it. They paid extra so you may breathe their bad air. If you hold the tobacco companies responsible, you must also find the government responsible. The Goverment is probably making a better profit in some states. Since these are tax dollars that you don't have to pay, you should start thanking random smokers who happen to be within breathing distance. They're killing themselves so you have less to pay. Just sit back and enjoy the FREE smoke that this poor asshole's hard earned dollars were spent to share.

RE: CNN.com - Vaccine halts lung cancer in small study - Feb. 19, 2004


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics