|
Slashdot | An Ignition Interlock In Every Car? by k at 9:38 am EST, Feb 19, 2004 |
] Monday the New Mexico House of Representatives passed a ] bill that would require every car sold in the state to ] have an ignition interlock. This device is essentially a ] breath analyzer that prevents the car from being started ] if the driver is drunk. The bill would require that every ] new car sold be equipped with an ignition interlock by ] 2008 and every used car by 2009. Ignition interlocks ] require a breath test, which takes 30 seconds to ] complete, to start the car as well as random 'rolling ] retests' to discourage others from taking the test for ] you. These rolling retests require the driver to take the ] test as the car is moving. If the driver fails a retest, ] the horn sounds and the lights flash until the car is ] turned off. [ Jesus. Fuck that. Sounds like a bunch of bullshit, and expense, for the millions of us who've never driven while even slightly drunk. I'm gonna be pissed if my car is $500 more expensive because there are a bunch of fucktards in this country that can't get it through their fucking heads that driving drunk is a fucking bad idea. This country claims to be founded on a distrust of government and a policy of minimal government invasiveness, and yet everyday someone is all about abdicating their responsibility to parent or drink responsibly or whatever in favor of mandating unwieldy controls. Completely absurd. -k] |
|
Slashdot | An Ignition Interlock In Every Car? by Acidus at 1:25 pm EST, Feb 19, 2004 |
inignoct wrote: ] ] Monday the New Mexico House of Representatives passed a ] ] bill that would require every car sold in the state to ] ] have an ignition interlock. This device is essentially a ] ] breath analyzer that prevents the car from being started ] ] if the driver is drunk. The bill would require that every ] ] new car sold be equipped with an ignition interlock by ] ] 2008 and every used car by 2009. Ignition interlocks ] ] require a breath test, which takes 30 seconds to ] ] complete, to start the car as well as random 'rolling ] ] retests' to discourage others from taking the test for ] ] you. These rolling retests require the driver to take the ] ] test as the car is moving. If the driver fails a retest, ] ] the horn sounds and the lights flash until the car is ] ] turned off. ] ] [ Jesus. Fuck that. Sounds like a bunch of bullshit, and ] expense, for the millions of us who've never driven while even ] slightly drunk. I'm gonna be pissed if my car is $500 more ] expensive because there are a bunch of fucktards in this ] country that can't get it through their fucking heads that ] driving drunk is a fucking bad idea. This country claims to ] be founded on a distrust of government and a policy of minimal ] government invasiveness, and yet everyday someone is all about ] abdicating their responsibility to parent or drink responsibly ] or whatever in favor of mandating unwieldy controls. ] Completely absurd. -k] I'm going to have to borrow one of Abaddon's lines here: What kind of no talent ass clowns do they elect in New Mexico that come up with an utterly retarded scheme like this? I understand that state's are low on money, but I expected to see a bill to bring the Roswell alien's out of storage and charge folks a nickel to see them instead of something so mindless. |
|
|
|