Acidus wrote:
] ] Personally, I don't see anything there that raises a red
] flag
] ] for me. There are plenty of other things that Bush says or
] ] does that I find annoying or inexcusable. But this
] ] 30-years-ago suspected-AWOL non-story is not one of them.
] ]
] ] Can we please go back to discussing *real* issues now?
]
] Where I come from lying on your resume gets you canned.
] Period. I agree with k's earlier comment: this *is* a big
] deal, this *is* a real issue. No, it's rumor-mongering by Democratic Party officials who are doing their level best to find an emotional rallying cry that distracts the public from discussing *real* issues. It's not coincidence that this came up during an election year. They're playing games with public opinion, so that they can position their Kerry War Hero against Bush-The-AWOL-Guardsman. (sigh) I guess if you want to see it as a real issue, that's your call. But I feel strongly that the Democratic Party is trying to use it for misdirection, and you're just falling for their bait. When it comes to election-year thought manipulation, Just Say No. | 
