Decius wrote:
] I say: This oped is sharp.

I say: It sounded like just another anti-Bush piece to me. It has a few good points, but also trots out some other tired and unproven accusations. For example, accusing the Bush administration of wanting to invade Iraq pre-9/11. And again misquoting Kay's report.

Different readers, different views (shrug).

To really get my attention, an essay has to be able to list both good things and bad things about a particular event. That would tell me that the writer was trying to honestly present both sides of an issue. This editorial was focused almost exclusively on pointing out negatives, so, personally, I file it away under "More election year crap."

RE: Mr. Bush's Version (of History? of the Present? of Reality?)