] all over the place. People seize on "no evidence of WMD
] stockpiles", and ignore everything else he said, such as the
] fact that he still thought the war was a good idea, and that
] it was still essential to keep looking, and that just because
] we haven't found stockpiles, does not mean that they didn't
] exist. It *was* confirmed by the U.N. that Iraq at one point
] had over 8000 liters of anthrax, and multiple tons of VX, but
] it's still uncertain as to just what exactly happened to those
] stockpiles.

I agree. I also watched him on Frontline the day before he resigned saying backpedeling like no tomorrow.

I think we can both say Iraq has had WMD. Not only the ones we gave him, but has the sought them as well. However unless new WMD's have been made since 1994, none of them are still weaponizable. Scientific American had an article on that last month. What happened to though weapons, while interesting to know, doesn't necessitate a war when we are lied to and told Iraq can launch WMD on 45 minutes notice. That what Bush said, and that was a lie.

RE: Blair Defends War Decision