|
Boston.com / News / Nation / Infiltration of files seen as extensive by Decius at 1:23 pm EST, Jan 22, 2004 |
] Republican staff members of the US Senate Judiciary ] Commitee infiltrated opposition computer files for a ] year, monitoring secret strategy memos and periodically ] passing on copies to the media, Senate officials told The ] Globe. ] ] From the spring of 2002 until at least April 2003, ] members of the GOP committee staff exploited a computer ] glitch that allowed them to access restricted Democratic ] communications without a password. Trolling through ] hundreds of memos, they were able to read talking points ] and accounts of private meetings discussing which ] judicial nominees Democrats would fight -- and with what ] tactics. |
|
RE: Boston.com / News / Nation / Infiltration of files seen as extensive by Lost at 5:33 pm EST, Jan 23, 2004 |
Decius wrote: ] ] Republican staff members of the US Senate Judiciary ] ] Commitee infiltrated opposition computer files for a ] ] year, monitoring secret strategy memos and periodically ] ] passing on copies to the media, Senate officials told The ] ] Globe. ] ] ] ] From the spring of 2002 until at least April 2003, ] ] members of the GOP committee staff exploited a computer ] ] glitch that allowed them to access restricted Democratic ] ] communications without a password. Trolling through ] ] hundreds of memos, they were able to read talking points ] ] and accounts of private meetings discussing which ] ] judicial nominees Democrats would fight -- and with what ] ] tactics. If you have filesystem permissions to access files, but you are aware that you are not supposed to be accessing them... that it is a "glitch," are you committing a crime by viewing, copying, and distributing those files? |
|
Boston.com / News / Nation / Infiltration of files seen as extensive by k at 1:20 pm EST, Jan 22, 2004 |
] Republican staff members of the US Senate Judiciary ] Commitee infiltrated opposition computer files for a ] year, monitoring secret strategy memos and periodically ] passing on copies to the media, Senate officials told The ] Globe. ] ] From the spring of 2002 until at least April 2003, ] members of the GOP committee staff exploited a computer ] glitch that allowed them to access restricted Democratic ] communications without a password. Trolling through ] hundreds of memos, they were able to read talking points ] and accounts of private meetings discussing which ] judicial nominees Democrats would fight -- and with what ] tactics. This is another fucking outrage that the media will probably happily bury under 36 more hours of that Dean clip. My faith in journalism is virtually non-existent as it is, and every story they miss because they're busy giving people the sensational train-wreck reality tv shite that the public wants, reather than the news and information that people NEED, etches away a little bit more. [incidentally, General Dynamics sounds familiar... is that the same company memestreams user Jessica works for? -k] |
Boston.com / News / Nation / Infiltration of files seen as extensive by Rattle at 5:37 pm EST, Jan 22, 2004 |
] Republican staff members of the US Senate Judiciary ] Commitee infiltrated opposition computer files for a ] year, monitoring secret strategy memos and periodically ] passing on copies to the media, Senate officials told The ] Globe. ] ] From the spring of 2002 until at least April 2003, ] members of the GOP committee staff exploited a computer ] glitch that allowed them to access restricted Democratic ] communications without a password. Trolling through ] hundreds of memos, they were able to read talking points ] and accounts of private meetings discussing which ] judicial nominees Democrats would fight -- and with what ] tactics. This should invoke Watergate style outrage, by reflex alone.. ] "There appears to have been no hacking, no stealing, and ] no violation of any Senate rule," Miranda said. "Stealing ] assumes a property right and there is no property right to ] a government document. . . . These documents are not ] covered under the Senate disclosure rule because they are ] not official business and, to the extent they were ] disclosed, they were disclosed inadvertently by negligent ] [Democratic] staff." Unbelievable... |
There is a redundant post from Acidus not displayed in this view.
|
|